<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polaplexer ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digdice.com/polaplexer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digdice.com/polaplexer/</link>
	<description>diy wifi antennas and designs, wireless tutorials, howto and other things ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: estqwerty</title>
		<link>http://www.digdice.com/polaplexer/comment-page-1/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>estqwerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digdice.com/2008/02/15/polaplexer/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>what about mimo and 802.11n ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about mimo and 802.11n ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estqwerty</title>
		<link>http://www.digdice.com/polaplexer/comment-page-1/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>estqwerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digdice.com/2008/02/15/polaplexer/#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>Thank You for comment.
Yes common can&#039;t - You can use mikrotick nstream2 and use 2 wifi cards - one to RX other to TX only - and they can be set to different but not overlapping channels in same band.
So this device is really interesting and need to be tested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You for comment.<br />
Yes common can&#8217;t &#8211; You can use mikrotick nstream2 and use 2 wifi cards &#8211; one to RX other to TX only &#8211; and they can be set to different but not overlapping channels in same band.<br />
So this device is really interesting and need to be tested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sushisan</title>
		<link>http://www.digdice.com/polaplexer/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>sushisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digdice.com/2008/02/15/polaplexer/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>This VERY INTERESTING system are not suitable for wifi sistem standard because only one antenna can transmit and the other only can receive. The common systems found in 802.11 systems can&#039;t split RX/TX system!!!

(I&#039;m the same user in zero13 forum ;-) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This VERY INTERESTING system are not suitable for wifi sistem standard because only one antenna can transmit and the other only can receive. The common systems found in 802.11 systems can&#8217;t split RX/TX system!!!</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m the same user in zero13 forum <img src='http://www.digdice.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

